Part 3 and Conclusion –
Workable models and methods that transform lives and so transform communities are available all over the world. This is where the American church might be wise to humbly learn from her brothers and sisters in other parts of the world. There are places in the world where the church is growing rapidly. More important than just growth, however, is the transforming power the message of Jesus and the way of Jesus is having upon whole sub-culture groups.
This will require the American churches and their leadership to admit that:
- For the most part, what is presently being done is not working and is not sustainable;
- The American church no longer has all the answers to address the world’s problem;
- The American churched that birthed so much of the 19th and 20th century missions movements is now in need of missions help itself; and,
- Change must take place before the changes of our American culture make the American church wholly irrelevant.
There will be no one method or model that will work in every ministry context in America. The diversity of our cities and even our rural areas require flexibility and creativity. Nevertheless, any method or model must answer a few simple questions:
- Does this actually lead to obedience to the way of Jesus that will transform lives?
- Is the reproducible from one believer to another, one church to another?
- Does this encourage indigenous leadership, that is, does it raise up leadership from within the church instead of relying on leadership to come from outside of it?
- Does this engage the larger ministry context of the community, town, or city and seek to bring transformation through Kingdom living and influence? Or, in other words, what Kingdom benefit is brought to the surrounding culture?
- Is it self-sustaining? Or, will it burden the church with constantly “feeding the dragon” to keep it going?
- Is it simple enough that children and young people will be able to communicate it and follow-through with it?
Much of the ministries in American churches today demand professional clergy leadership. On the other hand, in mission movements where the church is experience not simply growth but multiplication, there is not that luxury! And yet, the church continues to thrive and grow. Statistically, American church growth experts tell us that, overall, the higher the level of clergy education the less effective the church becomes (which will have to be a topic for another time). I am not arguing for Scriptural ignorance, but simply pointing out that perhaps the way we educate and disciple is the wrong model and not working today.
Even in America, fast growing church that are effective in creating genuine followers of Jesus have learned to adapt and adopt many of the same methods used by missionaries and their agencies overseas.
First, they quickly embed new believers into the Body of Christ and a small group of believers to learn spiritual life through prayer, Scripture, worship and witness.
Second, they expect believers to disciple or mentor new believers and new believers to share their new story with unbelievers in their circle of influence.
Then, they look for radical obedience to the words and ways and Jesus and target those individuals to start new churches or lead small groups of believers.
Notice that all education and spiritual transformation occurs within the context of relationships, ministry and obedient devotion to Jesus.
Is this process messy? It sure is! But then, I’m not too certain that our current American models are any less messy. We have just learned to cover it up, not deal with it, and sterilize the after-effects. It is all about keeping up appearances for our professional image.
The New Testament church was very messy. Amidst the rapidly growing young church, there were all kinds of problems. (Read the New Testament letters to the churches!) The apostle Paul did not seem to care if he made them public. He asserted that dealing with disobedience publicly demanded proper reverence for the Lord, his church and those the Lord placed in authority over it. At the same time, public affirmation and reconciliation, according to Paul’s methods, also testified to the restorative power of the message of Jesus and the work of the Holy Spirit.
By depending upon professional clergy for every aspect of church movement and growth, what we have we taught church people?
- Church people have learned that they cannot teach others unless they are properly educated and trained.
- Church people have learned that they cannot lead others in worship unless they have the right credentials.
- Church people have learned that only professional clergy really know how to pray.
- Church people have learned that there only purpose is to support the pastor and cheer him or her on in her Kingdom efforts.
- Church people have learned that ministry is what happens on the church platform, not what happens in their homes, workplaces, neighborhoods or other gathering places.
- Church people have learned that they cannot really understand the Bible unless they have gone to Bible School or Seminary.
I do not know any pastor in America that would say that these are the things that he set out to teach his parishioners. It seems to occur by default simply because of the model for ministry we utilize and the methods we use. I know for certain, in fact, that many, if not most, American pastors beat their heads against the wall because they see the effects of ministry presently and are frustrated by it. Almost every church leadership person that I have come across feels trapped by the structures presently at work.
Perhaps what are needed in order to teach and train church people differently are new churches. For myself, as I talk to pastors, missionaries and other leaders, I perceive that a church renewal or reformation is on the horizon. I pray that the leadership presently in place in our American churches and denominations embrace it. I pray that we will be brave enough to welcome the change into a new wineskin. Hopefully, the result will be that we will give church people something different to learn.
©Weatherstone/Ron Almberg, Jr. (2010)